The Effects of Reducing Information on a Modified Prisoner’s Dilemma Game
نویسندگان
چکیده
Participants played a modified prisoner’s dilemma game in which competition was created using a single player. The competition was between the player at the moment and the player in the future. The complexity of the game was increased across experiments. The transition from Experiment 1a to 1b saw the removal of information about future consequences and past behavior. Experiment 2 removed information about current outcomes. As the complexity of the game increased (both quantitatively and qualitatively) and therefore the external validity increased, the ability to “solve” the game decreased.
منابع مشابه
Modeling Cooperation between Nodes in Wireless Networks by APD Game
Cooperation is the foundation of many protocols in wireless networks. Without cooperation, the performance of a network significantly decreases. Hence, all nodes in traditional networks are required to cooperate with each other. In this paper, instead of traditional networks, a network of rational and autonomous nodes is considered, which means that each node itself can decide whe...
متن کاملModeling Cooperation between Nodes in Wireless Networks by APD Game
Cooperation is the foundation of many protocols in wireless networks. Without cooperation, the performance of a network significantly decreases. Hence, all nodes in traditional networks are required to cooperate with each other. In this paper, instead of traditional networks, a network of rational and autonomous nodes is considered, which means that each node itself can decide whe...
متن کاملSpinning Works: Strategy Framing in the One-Shot Prisoner’s Dilemma Game
The one-shot prisoner’s dilemma game has a unique dominance-solvable equilibrium. While others have studied framing some aspects of the game under laboratory conditions, the effects of non-neutral strategy labels has received significantly less study. In this experiment, I compare the effects of non-neutral strategy labels to baseline conditions, under both complete and incomplete information c...
متن کاملA review on symmetric games: theory, comparison and applications
Game theory models decision makers' behaviors in strategic situations. Since the structures of games are different, behavior and preferences of the players are different in various types of game. This paper reviews various situations of games. Here, characteristics of some common games are discussed and compared. Specifically, we focus on a group of games called symmetric games including Prison...
متن کاملThe use of mixed models in a modified Iowa Gambling Task and a prisoner’s dilemma game
Researchers in the decision making tradition usually analyze multiple decisions within experiments by aggregating choices across individuals and using the individual subject as the unit of analysis. This approach can mask important variations and patterns within the data. Specifically, it ignores variations in decisions across a task or game and possible influences of characteristics of the sub...
متن کامل